Papua New Guinea Commences Mid-Term Review of National Trade Policy 2017 – 2032

๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—” ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช ๐—š๐—จ๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜๐—” ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ ๐— ๐—œ๐——-๐—ง๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—  ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—˜๐—ช ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ก๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐——๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—–๐—ฌ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ โ€“ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฎ
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ข๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ (๐—ก๐—ง๐—ข), ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ถ๐—ฑ-๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„ (๐— ๐—ง๐—ฅ) ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜† (๐—ก๐—ง๐—ฃ) ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿณ-๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฎ. ๐—™๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐—ฎ ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—š๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฎโ€™๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ง๐—ฅ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐—ง๐—ฃ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜†โ€™๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ด๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€.
This review is made possible through the assistance of the European Union Delegation to PNG under the EUโ€™s Multi-Annual Indicative Programme, 2021 โ€“ 2027 funding facility, in alignment with the MTDP IV and the EUโ€™s Global Gateway Strategy, which has enabled the engagement of GFA Consulting Group to assist the NTO in the review.
PNGโ€™s trade performance and policy implementation over the past eight years need a thorough assessment so that successes can be built upon and shortcomings addressed. The review will help PNG align its trade policy with recent domestic priorities (such as the Medium-Term Development Plan and post-COVID economic recovery) and external developments (like environmental considerations, new market opportunities in Asia and evolving World Trade Organization rules).
Providing evidence-based analysis and guidance to the PNG government will demonstrate accountability for earlier capacity-building investments (e.g., the EUโ€™s support in developing the NTP) by evaluating outcomes to date. Moreover, the project enables support for PNG in adopting international best practices, fostering stakeholder engagement, and ultimately ensuring that trade policy remains effective and relevant.
Essentially, there will be three main elements to the review: the first is a retrospective assessment of the NTP to take stock of the progress, determine how effective the policy measures have contributed to the attainment of the objectives and identify key challenges with implementation. The second is a prospective assessment, which takes into account the current and emerging trade issues at the international and national levels and recommendations for adjustments. Thirdly, there will be a review of the National Trade Policyโ€™s Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) and integration of its findings.
Over the next several months, until November 2025, the National Trade Office will be engaged in extensive consultations with all concerned stakeholders. The NTO will lead; however, input from other government departments, agencies, provincial representatives, and regulatory bodies is necessary to gauge cross-sectoral progress. The private sector and SMEs will be consulted to understand the on-the-ground impacts of the trade policy and persistent business barriers. Civil society and academic experts can offer insights on inclusiveness (e.g., the impacts on small farmers or women traders) and provide evidence-based critiques. International and regional actors are also key stakeholders.
The WTO context is important, as PNGโ€™s policy should align with its multilateral commitments, since PNGโ€™s 2019 Third WTO trade policy review welcomed the NTP as a framework for such alignment.
Development partners like the European Union, which supported PNGโ€™s trade capacity under the 11th EDF and helped fund the NTPโ€™s formulation, have a stake in the policyโ€™s success and are providing technical input or resources for the midterm review.
Australia and New Zealand, as major trade partners and aid providers in the Pacific, along with regional bodies such as the Pacific Islands Forum and Melanesian Spearhead Group, are interested in PNGโ€™s trade reforms and regional trade integration efforts. These partners will be engaged to ensure that the midterm review captures opportunities for regional cooperation and technical assistance. Likewise, PNGโ€™s participation in APEC provides avenues to adopt best practices from Asia-Pacific peers.
Therefore, it is important for all concerned stakeholders to be part of the review that provides an opportunity to realign the NTP with current realities, ensuring its strategies remain relevant in the face of climate change impacts, advances in information technology, commodity price fluctuations, potential global trade disruptions due to US tariffs and shifting investment patterns. Accordingly, the National Trade Office will be inviting concerned stakeholders to participate in this Mid-Term Review exercise, with the final report expected to be presented to the government by January 2026.
Approved By:
Richard Yakam
Chief Trade Officer

Leave a Reply

screen tagHelp-Desk

Complaints